NVIDIA develops a method for training neural networks in 4-bit precision
NVIDIA has created NVFP4, a new methodology for training neural network models in 4-bit precision instead of the traditional 8-bit. The method cuts memory requirements by half, while the quality of the trained models barely suffers. The approach was validated on a 12-billion-parameter hybrid Mamba-Transformer model trained on 10 trillion tokens.
AI-processed from MarkTechPost; edited by Hamidun News
NVIDIA has unveiled NVFP4, a new methodology for training neural networks in 4-bit precision. It saves substantial memory and compute when training large models.
How it works
The standard approach uses 8-bit (FP8) or 16-bit (BF16) precision to store intermediate results and training gradients. NVIDIA managed to halve these memory requirements by moving to the 4-bit NVFP4 format.
The method does not simply cut precision. It combines several techniques: selective use of the more precise BF16 on critical layers of the model, special mathematical transforms of the gradient input data (16×16 random Hadamard transforms), and stochastic rounding during computation.
Traditionally, 4-bit training was considered risky: over long training runs, rounding errors accumulate and degrade the model. The company tested NVFP4 on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer model with 12 billion parameters, training it on 10 trillion tokens, the longest public experiment with 4-bit training. This shows that, with the right methodology, numerical errors do not accumulate catastrophically.
Results exceeded expectations
The key metric was accuracy on the MMLU-Pro benchmark, a broad knowledge test covering mathematics, natural sciences, the humanities and other areas. The NVFP4 model scored 62.58%, just 0.04% below the model trained with the traditional FP8 method (62.62%). For practical applications this difference is wholly insignificant: the accuracy is within measurement error.
Against the backdrop of a twofold memory saving, this is a rare case where lowering the precision of number representation did not noticeably reduce the quality of results. This means NVFP4 does not sacrifice correctness to save resources.
- Memory reduction: 2x compared with FP8
- Benchmark accuracy loss: less than 0.1%
- Experiment scale: 10 trillion tokens
- Architecture: hybrid Mamba-Transformer model with 12 billion parameters
What this means for the industry
The result matters for companies that train models from scratch. A 2x memory saving means the same amount of computation can run faster and cheaper, or the saved resources can go toward training larger models. If your company trains a model for 1000 A100 GPU-days, NVFP4 could cut that to 500 GPU-days while preserving quality.
For researchers, this opens new possibilities for experimenting with architectures, data volumes and hyperparameters. It will become easier to test new ideas on larger models within a single day than on smaller models over a week.
However, the method still needs further validation on other types of models, especially pure transformers and models with a different structure. So far NVIDIA has shown results only on the hybrid Mamba-Transformer architecture.
It is also important to understand that 4-bit training is a specialized technique that requires dedicated software optimizations and hardware support (for now, full support exists only on NVIDIA GPUs).
Key Questions Answered
How it works?
The standard approach uses 8-bit (FP8) or 16-bit (BF16) precision to store intermediate results and training gradients. NVIDIA managed to halve these memory requirements by moving to the 4-bit NVFP4 format. The method does not simply cut precision. It combines several techniques: selective use of the more precise BF16 on critical layers of the model, special mathematical transforms of the gradient input data (16×16 random Hadamard transforms), and stochastic rounding during computation. Traditionally, 4-bit training was considered risky: over long training runs, rounding er
What are the key details on Results exceeded expectations?
The key metric was accuracy on the MMLU-Pro benchmark, a broad knowledge test covering mathematics, natural sciences, the humanities and other areas. The NVFP4 model scored 62.58%, just 0.04% below the model trained with the traditional FP8 method (62.62%). For practical applications this difference is wholly insignificant: the accuracy is within measurement error. Against the backdrop of a twofold memory saving, this is a rare case where lowering the precision of number representation did not noticeably reduce the quality of results. This means NVFP4 does not sacrifice cor
What this means for the industry?
The result matters for companies that train models from scratch. A 2x memory saving means the same amount of computation can run faster and cheaper, or the saved resources can go toward training larger models. If your company trains a model for 1000 A100 GPU-days, NVFP4 could cut that to 500 GPU-days while preserving quality. For researchers, this opens new possibilities for experimenting with architectures, data volumes and hyperparameters. It will become easier to test new ideas on larger models within a single day than on smaller models over a week. However, the method s
Test Frontier LLMs & Autonomous Agents in One Workspace
Run Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6, Gemini 3.1, and DeepSeek side-by-side in Nomad AI (nomadnet.ai) — unified model routing, deep research, and multimodal workflows under one subscription.
The AI world, distilled — once a week
Seven stories that actually mattered, hand-picked. No noise, no reposts, no press releases.
Done! Check your inbox for a confirmation.