Directum pitches workflow agents as a practical way to bring AI into business processes
Directum argues that companies shouldn't wait for fully autonomous AI agents. Instead, it suggests deploying workflow agents: systems that follow a predefined scenario and leave a human in control. In a contract-review case, one such agent inside Directum RX cut initial review time from 30 to 5 minutes, reached 95% accuracy and saved about 4.8 million rubles a year.
AI-processed from Habr AI; edited by Hamidun News
Directum has proposed a more practical way for companies to adopt AI. Rather than fully autonomous "digital employees," it is betting on workflow agents that run on predefined logic inside the corporate system. The company says this approach removes the main obstacles businesses face: fear of a "black box," the risk of data leaks and unclear ROI.
Why not autopilot
Directum starts from a fairly conservative market demand. Mid-sized and large companies don't want to build processes on external cloud services when contracts, correspondence and internal policies are involved. They expect on-premises deployment, predictable integrations and clear limits on data access.
So instead of demo AI agents running "somewhere else," the company builds embedded assistants inside Directum RX. They run within the corporate perimeter and draw on internal documents via RAG. As a result, the agent works not with abstract knowledge but with the context of a specific organization: local regulations, instructions, email history and the role-based access model.
An employee can paste a link to an incoming email directly in the system interface, ask the agent to find similar cases and have it draft a reply. Crucially, the human doesn't drop out of the process: they review the output and keep the final decision, while the machine takes over search, cross-checking and preparatory routine.
How the workflow works
Directum describes the workflow agent as an intermediate but already useful class of AI agent. It doesn't try to become a universal "digital employee" that can sort out any ambiguous situation on its own. Its job is simpler and more practical: follow a predefined route, complete standard steps and hand the process to a human if the task falls outside the permitted scenario.
That controllability is exactly what makes the approach appealing to businesses that want predictable results, not a wow effect.
- extract data from a contract and identify key terms;
- check banking details, the amount and basic constraints against company rules;
- automatically route a standard document through the right approval branch;
- if there is a risk or non-standard wording, stop the flow and send the document for manual review with an explanation.
Contracts make this especially clear. The agent can extract data from a document, check the amount and banking details, determine whether the contract fits corporate rules and immediately flag questionable wording as a risk.
This gives businesses transparency: you can see which rule fired, why a document went to manual review and exactly where a human needs to step in. For compliance teams, lawyers and managers, this scenario is far less nerve-racking than rolling out a fully autonomous "black box."
The numbers and the next step
In one Directum case, the agent kicks in as soon as a contract is uploaded to the system. It runs a chain of preconfigured prompts, checks the text against corporate checklists for different counterparty types and verifies payment terms and transfer of ownership.
Then branching takes over. For contracts under 1 million rubles, a standard path is possible: the agent makes the decision itself under an agreed scenario and notifies an employee. For amounts above 1 million, it produces a structured report listing discrepancies and critical clauses.
The numbers here are operational, not experimental: initial review time dropped from 30 to 5 minutes, annual payroll savings reached about 4.8 million rubles, and review accuracy, according to the company, was 95%. This freed two staff lawyers from a stream of routine tasks and let them shift to complex contracts.
Directum sees the next step in "orchestrators" that will coordinate several narrow agents at once — for contracts, invoices and deadlines.
"AI runs the process; a human oversees it and makes the final
decisions on exceptions."
What this means
The enterprise AI market is gradually moving away from the idea of instantly replacing people with fully autonomous agents and shifting toward a more pragmatic model. For businesses, the path is simple: pick one overloaded process, hand the routine to a workflow agent, measure the savings and only then scale the approach to other operations.
- Nov 1, 2026New test catches hidden AI agent collusion by measuring how a partner reacts to a paraphrase
- Nov 1, 2026Illinois compiled 12 151 open problems and tested whether AI can solve them
- Oct 31, 2026AI engineer writes a single reward function for agent teams: win rate climbs from 51% to 90%
- Oct 31, 2026SkillMem stores an AI agent skill in 9.6 KB and speeds up a team 4.2x
Key Questions Answered
Why not autopilot?
Directum starts from a fairly conservative market demand. Mid-sized and large companies don't want to build processes on external cloud services when contracts, correspondence and internal policies are involved. They expect on-premises deployment, predictable integrations and clear limits on data access. So instead of demo AI agents running "somewhere else," the company builds embedded assistants inside Directum RX. They run within the corporate perimeter and draw on internal documents via RAG. As a result, the agent works not with abstract knowledge but with the context of
How the workflow works?
Directum describes the workflow agent as an intermediate but already useful class of AI agent. It doesn't try to become a universal "digital employee" that can sort out any ambiguous situation on its own. Its job is simpler and more practical: follow a predefined route, complete standard steps and hand the process to a human if the task falls outside the permitted scenario. That controllability is exactly what makes the approach appealing to businesses that want predictable results, not a wow effect. extract data from a contract and identify key terms; check banking details
What are the key details on The numbers and the next step?
In one Directum case, the agent kicks in as soon as a contract is uploaded to the system. It runs a chain of preconfigured prompts, checks the text against corporate checklists for different counterparty types and verifies payment terms and transfer of ownership. Then branching takes over. For contracts under 1 million rubles, a standard path is possible: the agent makes the decision itself under an agreed scenario and notifies an employee. For amounts above 1 million, it produces a structured report listing discrepancies and critical clauses. The numbers here are operation
Delegate Deep Research, Coding & Multi-Step Workflows to Nomad Agent
Deploy autonomous task execution with Nomad Agent (agent.nomadnet.ai) — automated web research, data synthesis, code generation, and MCP tool orchestration.
The AI world, distilled — once a week
Seven stories that actually mattered, hand-picked. No noise, no reposts, no press releases.
Done! Check your inbox for a confirmation.