OpenAI researcher quits over ads, warning of a Facebook-style path

# Ads in ChatGPT trigger a crisis of conscience at OpenAI

Zoë Hitzig, one of OpenAI's leading researchers, announced she was leaving the company on the very day the startup began openly testing ads inside ChatGPT. The timing is unlikely to be a coincidence: in her resignation statement, Hitzig pointed directly to a gap between OpenAI's professed values and its actual actions. She warned the company's leadership against repeating Facebook's mistakes, when the chase for ad revenue ultimately compromised user trust and became a source of systemic problems with privacy and content quality.

Her departure points to a much deeper conflict unfolding inside one of the most influential companies in artificial intelligence. OpenAI, which presents itself as a responsible AI developer, faces growing discontent among its own staff. On one hand, the company has raised billions in investment and promised investors a path to profitability. On the other, many insiders see each new step toward commercialization as a threat to the fundamental principles on which the organization was founded.

Bringing ads to ChatGPT is not just a technical change. It raises the question of whom, or what, the company is optimizing its product for. When the main source of revenue shifts from user subscriptions to advertising, the incentives themselves change. The platform becomes less interested in the quality of its answers than in maximizing the time users spend on the site. That creates a conflict of interest: advertisers benefit from maximum visibility and contact with the user, while users benefit from fast, high-quality information. Facebook's history shows clearly how such conflicts erode trust over time and lead to reputational damage.

Hitzig's exit carries extra weight against the backdrop of other events at OpenAI. In recent months the company has gone through serious internal upheaval, from the ouster and return of CEO Sam Altman to public disagreements among employees over the company's direction. Researchers and ethicists who once felt like the driving force of the company increasingly find themselves a voice in the wilderness when strategic decisions are made. Hitzig was a respected member of the team, and her resignation, with its explicit criticism of the company, may serve as a warning bell for other specialists who share her concerns.

The question of how to monetize AI services without compromising their quality and reliability is not just OpenAI's internal business. It is a strategic question for the whole industry. If one of the market leaders chooses Facebook's path, it could set a kind of behavioral norm for everyone else. What's more, it will shape how ordinary users perceive AI tools, people who already distrust technology and the companies that build it.

The balance between innovation and responsibility at OpenAI has proved harder than it looked in theory. Hitzig's departure is not just the loss of one talent; it signals that the company has to choose between who it wants to be in the long run and what short-term profits it can pocket.

*Meta has been designated an extremist organization and is banned in Russia.