Delete Grok: Rights Groups Demand Apple and Google Pull X From Their App Stores
Twenty-eight human rights organizations have sent open letters to Tim Cook (Apple) and Sundar Pichai (Google), demanding that X and Grok be removed from the App Store and Google Play. The groups cite the spread of sexual deepfakes and material that may contain child sexual abuse content, which they say violates the rules of both companies.
AI-processed from The Verge; edited by Hamidun News
A growing scandal is building around the social network X (formerly Twitter) and Grok, the chatbot developed by xAI. A coalition of 28 rights organizations, including women's groups and technology watchdogs, has sent open letters to the heads of Apple and Google, demanding that X and Grok be removed from their app stores. The reason: content that violates platform rules, specifically sexual deepfakes created without the consent of the people depicted, and material that, in the organizations' view, may contain child sexual abuse content.
The situation is made worse, the groups say, by the fact that Grok is actively used to create and spread such images. They stress that this kind of content not only breaks the Apple App Review Guidelines but is also a criminal offense. Grok's availability both through the X app and directly through a web interface sharpens the problem, since it widens the potential audience, minors included.
Deepfakes and their spread on social networks are far from new, but the problem grows more pressing as generative AI advances. Creating realistic fake images and video is getting easier and cheaper, which poses serious risks to people's privacy and safety. Women and children are especially vulnerable and are more often the victims of such content.
The groups' demand puts Apple and Google in a difficult position. On one hand, they are obliged to follow their own rules and keep users safe. On the other, removing a popular app like X could provoke a backlash from users and accusations of censorship. It also raises questions about free speech and where platforms' responsibility for user-generated content ends.
The impact of the decision could be significant for the whole industry. If Apple and Google meet the groups' demands, it would set a precedent and could lead to tighter rules for other social networks and platforms that use AI. It could also spur the development of more effective tools for detecting and removing deepfakes and other harmful content.
Ultimately, success in fighting the spread of deepfakes and other forms of online abuse depends on joint efforts by technology companies, law enforcement, rights organizations and users themselves. It is not enough to develop and deploy new technology; society also needs greater awareness of the risks tied to deepfakes, and people need to be taught to recognize them.
- Nov 2, 2026LLM Agent Built a Gearbox in KOMPAS-3D, but Scored Only 50 out of 100 on the Specification
- Nov 2, 2026Karpathy Built HackerTube, a Catalog of 6,454 Videos, in Two Hours with Claude Code
- Nov 2, 2026Я устроил допрос 6 нейросетям про себя и своё ИП глазами заказчика: как ИИ выдумал мне бизнес на Amazon в США и слил смету из закрытого КП
- Nov 2, 2026NVIDIA releases Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B: 4 GB and 133 tokens per second on an RTX 5070
Test Frontier LLMs & Autonomous Agents in One Workspace
Run Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6, Gemini 3.1, and DeepSeek side-by-side in Nomad AI (nomadnet.ai) — unified model routing, deep research, and multimodal workflows under one subscription.
The AI world, distilled — once a week
Seven stories that actually mattered, hand-picked. No noise, no reposts, no press releases.
Done! Check your inbox for a confirmation.