Post About Abandoning AI Coding Scores 1038 Points on Hacker News—Habr Author Reaches Different Conclusion

On May 9, 2026, a post titled "I'm going back to writing code by hand" scored 1038 points on Hacker News and 617 comments. Its author spent seven months vibe-coding a Kubernetes dashboard with the help of Claude model, brought the project to a god object with 1690 lines of code, and ultimately rejected AI-coding. The author of a Habr publication recognized his own experience from half a year ago in this story, but drew a different conclusion.

What Happened to the Author of the Original Post

Seven months of work on a Kubernetes dashboard using vibe-coding based on Claude did not lead to a neat modular architecture, but to a so-called god object — a single bloated piece of code with 1690 lines, in which almost all the application logic is concentrated. Apparently, this result became the last straw: the author decided to return to writing code by hand, and his post reflecting on this experience caused a disproportionately wide response — 1038 points and 617 comments on Hacker News — a rare level of engagement even for a popular technical platform.

• The post "I'm going back to writing code by hand" was published on May 9, 2026
• On Hacker News, it scored 1038 points and 617 comments
• Project — a Kubernetes dashboard, on which the author worked for seven months
• The result of vibe-coding with Claude — a god object with 1690 lines of code
• The Habr author experienced a similar experience approximately half a year ago

Why the Habr Author Drew a Different Conclusion

The author of the Habr publication directly admits: he recognized his own experience from half a year ago in the story of the god object — that is, he also went through a similar situation with overgrown code written mostly through vibe-coding. But instead of following the author of the Hacker News post and completely abandoning AI-coding, he came to a different conclusion, different from the radical "return to manual code writing". The very scale of the response — over a thousand points and more than six hundred comments on Hacker News — shows that the topic of god object as a typical vibe-coding failure resonates with a wide range of developers, not just a single case.

What It Means

The story of a god object of 1690 lines, grown from seven months of vibe-coding, and the stormy reaction to it on Hacker News show: the developer community is still looking for a balance between the speed of AI-coding and architectural discipline, and different developers who encountered the same problem draw opposite conclusions from it — one abandons AI-coding, the other continues to seek a way to work with it differently.