Three-part series on GEO published: optimizing for ChatGPT, Claude and other AI models

Habr has published the first part of a series on GEO (Generation Engine Optimization), the practice of optimizing content for generative AI models such as ChatGPT and Claude. The author argues that competing for visibility in AI systems is not just a matter of improving SEO, but a distinct field with different rules, metrics and algorithms. The series has three parts: the conceptual foundation, content and fact-checking, and applied technique with examples.

AI-processed from Habr AI; edited by Hamidun News
Three-part series on GEO published: optimizing for ChatGPT, Claude and other AI models
Source: Habr AI. Collage: Hamidun News.
Listen to article
Article Fact Sheet & Key Figures
ParameterDetails
Primary sourceHabr AI ↗
Editor-in-Chief
Target audiencein SEO, it is people searching for information; in GEO, it is the AI models themselves, which aggregate that information
MetricsSEO looks at clicks, conversions and time on site; GEO looks at mentions, citations and inclusion in the context window
Ranking algorithmsSEO relies on domain authority and links; GEO relies on text parsing, chunk relevance and a source's authority in the eyes of the models

In July 2026, Habr published the first part of a trilogy on GEO (Generation Engine Optimization), the discipline of competing for content visibility in generative AI models such as ChatGPT and Claude. The author argues that the era of promotion in AI systems has already arrived: it is no longer theory or speculation.

How GEO differs from SEO

GEO is not simply an add-on to classic search optimization. It is a standalone field with its own ranking rules, its own success metrics and an entirely different logic. In search results (SEO), you compete for clicks: your link must be visible, your headline must catch the eye, and your snippet must persuade the user to click. In AI-generated answers (GEO), your content competes for something else entirely: getting into the training set or into the context window the model uses to generate a response.

Key differences:

  • Target audience: in SEO, it is people searching for information; in GEO, it is the AI models themselves, which aggregate that information
  • Metrics: SEO looks at clicks, conversions and time on site; GEO looks at mentions, citations and inclusion in the context window
  • Ranking algorithms: SEO relies on domain authority and links; GEO relies on text parsing, chunk relevance and a source's authority in the eyes of the models
  • Lifespan: SEO traffic can keep coming for years; GEO traffic is split among all the sources that make it into the generated answer

Why this is not a cosmetic add-on

In the original article, the author stresses that GEO is not SEO with a bonus. The fight for visibility in AI models follows entirely different rules, and ignoring it is risky. Content optimized for SEO can be invisible to ChatGPT or Claude. Conversely, material that is ideal for AI-generated answers can be invisible to classic search engines.

Structure of the series: from theory to practice

The trilogy is split so that each part can be read independently:

1. Part 1 (published): the conceptual foundation: what happens in AI-generated results, what is being fought over, and why SEO recipes do not work 2. Part 2: the content layer: grounding in models, fact-checking, how AI models choose sources, and why AI-driven manipulation is doomed 3. Part 3: applied technique: chunking, markup, KPIs, and attributing traffic from AI models

What this means

GEO is becoming a separate marketing discipline. It used to be enough to optimize for Google and Yandex; now a further branch is needed: optimization for AI systems. Materials that ignore GEO gradually lose visibility in new traffic channels. Those who start working with GEO now will gain an edge over competitors.

Story

Key Questions Answered

How GEO differs from SEO?

GEO is not simply an add-on to classic search optimization. It is a standalone field with its own ranking rules, its own success metrics and an entirely different logic. In search results (SEO), you compete for clicks: your link must be visible, your headline must catch the eye, and your snippet must persuade the user to click. In AI-generated answers (GEO), your content competes for something else entirely: getting into the training set or into the context window the model uses to generate a response. Key differences: Target audience: in SEO, it is people searching for inf

Why this is not a cosmetic add-on?

In the original article, the author stresses that GEO is not SEO with a bonus. The fight for visibility in AI models follows entirely different rules, and ignoring it is risky. Content optimized for SEO can be invisible to ChatGPT or Claude. Conversely, material that is ideal for AI-generated answers can be invisible to classic search engines.

What are the key details on Structure of the series: from theory to practice?

The trilogy is split so that each part can be read independently: 1. Part 1 (published): the conceptual foundation: what happens in AI-generated results, what is being fought over, and why SEO recipes do not work 2. Part 2: the content layer: grounding in models, fact-checking, how AI models choose sources, and why AI-driven manipulation is doomed 3. Part 3: applied technique: chunking, markup, KPIs, and attributing traffic from AI models

ZK
Zhemal Khamidun — CPO at Alpina Digital, product manager of AlpinaGPT. Building AI products since 2019. Hamidun News is a pet project that grew into a production aggregator with 6,000+ readers.
✦ Unified AI Workspace · Nomad

Test Frontier LLMs & Autonomous Agents in One Workspace

Run Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6, Gemini 3.1, and DeepSeek side-by-side in Nomad AI (nomadnet.ai) — unified model routing, deep research, and multimodal workflows under one subscription.

Try Nomad AI →Launch Nomad Agent
What do you think?
Loading comments…